At present, with the continuous improvement of the automation level of petrochemical, steel, paper, food, and pharmaceutical companies, higher requirements are placed on the technical level of field instrument maintenance personnel. In order to shorten the processing time of the instrument and ensure safe production and improve economic efficiency, this paper publishes a little on-site maintenance experience for instrument maintenance personnel.
First, the basic analysis steps of field instrument system failures Field instrument measurement parameters are generally divided into four parameters of temperature, pressure, flow, liquid level.
According to the different measurement parameters, different field instrument faults are analyzed.
1. First of all, before analyzing the failure of the field instrument, it is necessary to thoroughly understand the production process, production process conditions and conditions of the relevant instrument system, understand the design scheme, design intent of the instrument system, the structure, characteristics, performance and parameter requirements of the instrument system.
2. Before the analysis and inspection of the failure of the on-site instrument system, the operator should be informed of the production load and the changes in the parameters of the raw materials, view the recording curve of the fault meter, and perform comprehensive analysis to determine the cause of the instrument failure.
3. If the meter records a dead line (a line that does not change at all is called a dead line), or if the record curve originally fluctuates, it suddenly becomes a straight line; the fault is likely to be in the instrument system. Because the current recording instruments are mostly DCS computer systems, the sensitivity is very high, and the change of parameters can be very sensitive to the reaction. At this point can artificially change the process parameters to see the curve changes. If it does not change, the basic conclusion is that the instrument system has a problem; if there is a normal change, it is basically determined that the instrument system has no major problems.
4. When the process parameters were changed, it was found that the recorded curve was abruptly changed or jumped to large or small. At this time, the faults were often in the instrument system.
5. Before the fault appeared, the instrument record curve had been performing normally. After the fluctuation, the recording curve became irregular or the system was difficult to control. Even the manual operation could not be controlled. At this time, the fault may be caused by the process operating system.
6. When it is found that the DCS display instrument is not normal, you can go to the scene to check the indicator value of the same intuitive instrument. If they are very different, it is likely that the instrument system has failed.
In short, when analyzing the causes of field instrument failures, special attention must be paid to the changes in the characteristics of the measured control object and the control valve, which may be the cause of the failure of the field instrument system. Therefore, we must comprehensively consider and carefully analyze the field instrument system and the process operating system to check the reason.
Second, the four major measurement parameters instrument control system failure analysis steps 1. Temperature control instrument system failure analysis step analysis Temperature control instrument system failure, we must first pay attention to two points: The system instrument uses electric meter measurement, indication, and control; the system instrument measurement is often lagging behind.
(1) The indicator value of the temperature meter system suddenly becomes large or small, which is generally a fault of the instrument system. Because the temperature meter system measures large lags, sudden changes do not occur. Most of the faults at this time are due to the thermocouple, thermal resistance, wire breakage in the compensation lead, or malfunction of the transmitter amplifier.
(2) Temperature control instrumentation system indicates rapid oscillation, which is mostly caused by improper adjustment of control parameter PID.
(3) The temperature control instrumentation system indicates the occurrence of large and slow fluctuations, which may be due to changes in process operations. If the process operation does not change at that time, it is likely that the instrument control system itself has failed.
(4) Failure analysis procedure of the temperature control system itself: Check whether the input signal of the regulating valve changes, the input signal does not change, the regulating valve is actuated, and the diaphragm of the valve diaphragm is leaked; check whether the input signal of the regulating valve positioner changes, and the input signal No change, the output signal changes, the positioner has a fault; check the positioner input signal changes, and then check the regulator output if there is no change, if the regulator input does not change, the output changes, this time is the fault of the regulator itself.
2. Pressure control instrument system failure analysis steps (1) pressure control system instrument indicates rapid oscillation fluctuations, first check whether the process operation changes, this change is mostly caused by the process operation and regulator PID parameter setting is not good.
(2) The pressure control system instrument indicates dead line, the process operation changes the pressure indication or does not change, the general failure occurs in the pressure measurement system, first check whether the measurement pressure piping system has a plugging phenomenon, no plugging, check the pressure change The transmitter output system has no change, there are changes, the fault is in the controller measurement indicator system.
3. Flow control instrument system failure analysis steps (1) flow control instrumentation system indicates that the value reaches the hour, first check the scene detection instrument, if normal, then the failure to display the instrument. When the on-site detection instrument indicator is also small, check the opening of the regulating valve. If the opening degree of the regulating valve is zero, it is often a fault between the regulating valve and the regulator. When the on-site detection instrument indicates small and the opening of the regulating valve is normal, the cause of the failure is likely to be caused by insufficient system pressure, blocked system piping, insufficient pump volume, crystallization of the medium, improper operation, and other reasons. If the instrument is faulty, the reasons are as follows: orifice differential pressure flowmeter may be positive pressure induction conduit plug; differential pressure transmitter positive pressure chamber leakage; mechanical flowmeter is gear stuck or filter plugging.
(2) When the indicator value of the flow control instrument system reaches a large value, the detection instrument often indicates a large value. At this point you can manually control the valve to open large or small, if the flow can be reduced, it is generally caused by the process operation. If the flow rate does not fall, it is the cause of the instrument system. Check whether the regulating valve of the flow control instrumentation system operates; check whether the instrument measures the pressure stimulating system is normal; check whether the instrument signal transmission system is normal.
(3) The flow control instrumentation system indicates that the value fluctuates more frequently. The control can be changed to manual. If the fluctuation is reduced, it is the cause of the instrument or the instrument control parameter PID is not suitable. If the fluctuation is still frequent, it is the process operation. Caused by.
4. Level control instrument system failure analysis steps (1) liquid level control instrumentation system indicator changes to large or small, you can first check the instrument to see if it is normal, if the instructions are normal, change the liquid level control to manual remote liquid level, look at the liquid Bit change situation. If the liquid level can be stabilized in a certain range, the fault is in the liquid level control system; if the liquid level cannot be stabilized, it is generally a fault caused by the process system, and the cause must be looked up from the process.
(2) When the differential pressure type liquid level control instrument indicator and on-site direct-reading indicator instrument indicator are not on, first check whether the direct-reading indicator instrument is normal. If the indicator is normal, check the negative pressure guide of the differential pressure level instrument. If there is leakage, refill the liquid and adjust the zero point; if there is no leakage, the negative migration amount of the instrument may be wrong. Adjust the migration amount to make the indicator normal.
(3) When the indicating value of the liquid level control instrumentation system changes frequently and fluctuates frequently, it is necessary to first analyze the capacity of the liquid level control object to analyze the cause of the failure. The large capacity is generally caused by instrument failure. The first thing to do is to analyze whether there is any change in the process operation. If there is any change, it is likely that the process will cause frequent fluctuations. If no change may be caused by instrument failure.
The above is only the on-site four-parameter control parameters of the instrument's field failure analysis, the actual site there are some complex control loops, such as cascade control, split control, program control, interlock control and so on. The analysis of these failures is more complex and requires detailed analysis.
Hardness Tester, Roughness Tester, Vibrometer, Coating Thickness Gauge, Ultrasonic Thickness Gauge Sales Hotline/76/78/79
13371602179/13311188873
First, the basic analysis steps of field instrument system failures Field instrument measurement parameters are generally divided into four parameters of temperature, pressure, flow, liquid level.
According to the different measurement parameters, different field instrument faults are analyzed.
1. First of all, before analyzing the failure of the field instrument, it is necessary to thoroughly understand the production process, production process conditions and conditions of the relevant instrument system, understand the design scheme, design intent of the instrument system, the structure, characteristics, performance and parameter requirements of the instrument system.
2. Before the analysis and inspection of the failure of the on-site instrument system, the operator should be informed of the production load and the changes in the parameters of the raw materials, view the recording curve of the fault meter, and perform comprehensive analysis to determine the cause of the instrument failure.
3. If the meter records a dead line (a line that does not change at all is called a dead line), or if the record curve originally fluctuates, it suddenly becomes a straight line; the fault is likely to be in the instrument system. Because the current recording instruments are mostly DCS computer systems, the sensitivity is very high, and the change of parameters can be very sensitive to the reaction. At this point can artificially change the process parameters to see the curve changes. If it does not change, the basic conclusion is that the instrument system has a problem; if there is a normal change, it is basically determined that the instrument system has no major problems.
4. When the process parameters were changed, it was found that the recorded curve was abruptly changed or jumped to large or small. At this time, the faults were often in the instrument system.
5. Before the fault appeared, the instrument record curve had been performing normally. After the fluctuation, the recording curve became irregular or the system was difficult to control. Even the manual operation could not be controlled. At this time, the fault may be caused by the process operating system.
6. When it is found that the DCS display instrument is not normal, you can go to the scene to check the indicator value of the same intuitive instrument. If they are very different, it is likely that the instrument system has failed.
In short, when analyzing the causes of field instrument failures, special attention must be paid to the changes in the characteristics of the measured control object and the control valve, which may be the cause of the failure of the field instrument system. Therefore, we must comprehensively consider and carefully analyze the field instrument system and the process operating system to check the reason.
Second, the four major measurement parameters instrument control system failure analysis steps 1. Temperature control instrument system failure analysis step analysis Temperature control instrument system failure, we must first pay attention to two points: The system instrument uses electric meter measurement, indication, and control; the system instrument measurement is often lagging behind.
(1) The indicator value of the temperature meter system suddenly becomes large or small, which is generally a fault of the instrument system. Because the temperature meter system measures large lags, sudden changes do not occur. Most of the faults at this time are due to the thermocouple, thermal resistance, wire breakage in the compensation lead, or malfunction of the transmitter amplifier.
(2) Temperature control instrumentation system indicates rapid oscillation, which is mostly caused by improper adjustment of control parameter PID.
(3) The temperature control instrumentation system indicates the occurrence of large and slow fluctuations, which may be due to changes in process operations. If the process operation does not change at that time, it is likely that the instrument control system itself has failed.
(4) Failure analysis procedure of the temperature control system itself: Check whether the input signal of the regulating valve changes, the input signal does not change, the regulating valve is actuated, and the diaphragm of the valve diaphragm is leaked; check whether the input signal of the regulating valve positioner changes, and the input signal No change, the output signal changes, the positioner has a fault; check the positioner input signal changes, and then check the regulator output if there is no change, if the regulator input does not change, the output changes, this time is the fault of the regulator itself.
2. Pressure control instrument system failure analysis steps (1) pressure control system instrument indicates rapid oscillation fluctuations, first check whether the process operation changes, this change is mostly caused by the process operation and regulator PID parameter setting is not good.
(2) The pressure control system instrument indicates dead line, the process operation changes the pressure indication or does not change, the general failure occurs in the pressure measurement system, first check whether the measurement pressure piping system has a plugging phenomenon, no plugging, check the pressure change The transmitter output system has no change, there are changes, the fault is in the controller measurement indicator system.
3. Flow control instrument system failure analysis steps (1) flow control instrumentation system indicates that the value reaches the hour, first check the scene detection instrument, if normal, then the failure to display the instrument. When the on-site detection instrument indicator is also small, check the opening of the regulating valve. If the opening degree of the regulating valve is zero, it is often a fault between the regulating valve and the regulator. When the on-site detection instrument indicates small and the opening of the regulating valve is normal, the cause of the failure is likely to be caused by insufficient system pressure, blocked system piping, insufficient pump volume, crystallization of the medium, improper operation, and other reasons. If the instrument is faulty, the reasons are as follows: orifice differential pressure flowmeter may be positive pressure induction conduit plug; differential pressure transmitter positive pressure chamber leakage; mechanical flowmeter is gear stuck or filter plugging.
(2) When the indicator value of the flow control instrument system reaches a large value, the detection instrument often indicates a large value. At this point you can manually control the valve to open large or small, if the flow can be reduced, it is generally caused by the process operation. If the flow rate does not fall, it is the cause of the instrument system. Check whether the regulating valve of the flow control instrumentation system operates; check whether the instrument measures the pressure stimulating system is normal; check whether the instrument signal transmission system is normal.
(3) The flow control instrumentation system indicates that the value fluctuates more frequently. The control can be changed to manual. If the fluctuation is reduced, it is the cause of the instrument or the instrument control parameter PID is not suitable. If the fluctuation is still frequent, it is the process operation. Caused by.
4. Level control instrument system failure analysis steps (1) liquid level control instrumentation system indicator changes to large or small, you can first check the instrument to see if it is normal, if the instructions are normal, change the liquid level control to manual remote liquid level, look at the liquid Bit change situation. If the liquid level can be stabilized in a certain range, the fault is in the liquid level control system; if the liquid level cannot be stabilized, it is generally a fault caused by the process system, and the cause must be looked up from the process.
(2) When the differential pressure type liquid level control instrument indicator and on-site direct-reading indicator instrument indicator are not on, first check whether the direct-reading indicator instrument is normal. If the indicator is normal, check the negative pressure guide of the differential pressure level instrument. If there is leakage, refill the liquid and adjust the zero point; if there is no leakage, the negative migration amount of the instrument may be wrong. Adjust the migration amount to make the indicator normal.
(3) When the indicating value of the liquid level control instrumentation system changes frequently and fluctuates frequently, it is necessary to first analyze the capacity of the liquid level control object to analyze the cause of the failure. The large capacity is generally caused by instrument failure. The first thing to do is to analyze whether there is any change in the process operation. If there is any change, it is likely that the process will cause frequent fluctuations. If no change may be caused by instrument failure.
The above is only the on-site four-parameter control parameters of the instrument's field failure analysis, the actual site there are some complex control loops, such as cascade control, split control, program control, interlock control and so on. The analysis of these failures is more complex and requires detailed analysis.
Hardness Tester, Roughness Tester, Vibrometer, Coating Thickness Gauge, Ultrasonic Thickness Gauge Sales Hotline/76/78/79
13371602179/13311188873
Hot stuffy processing device for steel slag is processing device and a hot and stuffy technology, applied in the field of steel-making slag recycling and processing devices, can solve the problems of prominent safety problems in the production process, increased pressure of the stuffy furnace, difficult maintenance, etc., and achieve stable and controllable product quality and improved production efficiency, the effect of reducing maintenance costs.
Steel Slag Hot Stuffy,Steel Mill Slag Processing,Slag Handling Machines,Slag Bucket Hot Stuffy
Shenyang North Heavy Metallurgical Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.nhmetallurgy.com