Farmers buy food privately: don't convict first

According to the current relevant laws and regulations, individuals are not allowed to purchase food privately without going through relevant formalities. There are laws that must be followed, and violations of the law must be investigated. There is no doubt. It is natural to impose a certain amount of privately acquired food, etc., regardless of whether you know this law or regulation. Regardless of whether there are other problems in this report, it is not uncommon in rural areas.

Farmers buy food privately: don't convict first

There are similar problems in rural areas. What we should reflect on is why people are repeatedly stumbling over this "stone"? As a relevant department, is it also necessary to reflect on the work of farmers from the corn can be profitable?

First, are similar laws and regulations stipulated that it is still suitable for the current social situation?

As a populous country, when food security cannot be relaxed, this is undoubted and must be effectively implemented. At the same time, with the rapid development of society, modern science and technology continue to emerge, food security content standards should be adjusted according to the actual needs.

Second, the relevant functional departments reflect on the farmers' money to make money.

Food is a strategic material. In order to avoid the chaos in the food market and ensure the bottom line of food security, it is no exaggeration to take any measures. Of course, is it necessary for our relevant functional departments to carry out the necessary self-reflection through this phenomenon? Why do farmers make money on their own acquisitions, and our own large-scale acquisitions will not necessarily make money? Is there a problem with not working in place? Is there a problem of serious waste and low efficiency? The bottom line of food security is not the lifeline of the food management department, and it is not a warehouse that can be arbitrarily attached to sucking. Only the relevant functional departments can seriously reflect on them, find out their own deficiencies and make effective corrections, so that they can not give the criminals a chance.

The third is to find out why the farmer’s private acquisition of Yumin can make a profit.

For what reason can the farmer buy food to make money? This is not just what he dares to do and can achieve. Effectively identifying the reasons for its low cost and identifying ways to make profits can not only provide a typical case for food security, but also find out whether there are certain loopholes in our current food security work. ? If the corresponding corrective measures can be taken in a timely and effective manner, ensure that the granary does not run into a leak.

Fourth, we must do a good job in propaganda work for the masses.

When some local corn is not needed, the people buy it themselves. This is a very popular thing for some farmers in the grain-producing areas. If you simply treat it with a hard law, blindly speaking on the floor, for some peasant masses, it may not have the role of propaganda and education, and may even be intensified because of other social problems. When doing this problem well, the local grassroots organizations should play an effective role in persuading education, and our relevant functional departments should also promote the relevant national policies and regulations, and at the same time, continue to improve services and transform services. Attitude, take seriously the problem of food and agriculture sales difficulties, and really help our farmers solve the practical difficulties and problems in food production and sales, so that the grain farmers have no worries. In this way, we can truly solve the practical problems of grain farmers and fundamentally lay the foundation for national food security.

(Original title: Sentenced from the farmer’s unlicensed purchase of food)